Eco GOP News

Interpol and the rights g-d gave you

admin — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 14:27:25 +0000

As I go through another morning news of Warren Beatty vs. Tiger Woods and nonsense made to be priorities in our lives, I wonder just how many Americans are aware of the fact that our rights are gone. Even more alarming is the fact that many of the ones who know just don’t care enough. Is the tire deflated? Do we have any fight left within us?
One must ask himself just how far we have to be pushed to lose it, or IF indeed we will lose it by protesting uncontrollable or are we just going to collapse and give in. Surrender in someone else’s religion or agenda. “Submit” as we are called to? What is it? Who are we and where exactly do we draw a line when it comes to believing what religion is telling us, scientists are telling us and our neighbors and friends gossip and joke about during our evening get togethers.
Did you know that Interpol, the universal police force now has 12,000 + agents? Are you also aware that President Obama has signed an extension to the 1983 initiated by Ronald Reagan immunity but this time with limitations removed?
You didn’t hear about it or you don’t want to?
Now the “Environmental Crimes Unit” of Interpol could legally come into your house and not even need to justify the need to by making up some story about your carbon emission. They can just go in, do to you whatever they like and enjoy full immunity. I am alarmed, but most Americans are not. Why?
There will not be many more chances to keep ourselves together. We need to take interest. If we don’t, nobody will feel sorry for you when it’s too late.
Take action, America. Do not allow environmental issues to be used to take away your freedoms!

MD from ECO GOP

Arctic Meltdown and the Sealevel Fail

admin — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:32:04 +0000

I’ve had the choice whether or not to use the sort of language scientists choose knowing most of the population will not be able to follow, or go back to reality in its simplicity to demonstrate the obvious which has been so skillfully confused. We are reading so many articles and because of our lazy minds and lack of education, we allow our tax money to be spent on causes non existent and non threatening.

So as you can see, there is absolutely zero change to the sea level. Please do not take my word. Fill a glass with water, then add ice in it so that the water level is all the way to the top of the glass. Place the glass on dry ground and wipe everything dry. Then make sure that you will look for any sign of spills.

Of course, the tiny (compared to the whole entire globe) continent of Antarctica is land while the arctic is water. Until we have our upcoming article ready to demonstrate to you what has been hidden from you, we ask you to make a few guesses and asks your friends and family the following:

Let’s say that the globe is a swimming pool for kids, an inflatable one around 10 feet diameter.

The earth consists of 508 Million 450 Thousand square kilometers total.
361 Million Square kilometers of those are water.
The Antarctica is 14 Million Square kilometers of land and

well, let’s keep this for our next lesson.

What we have learned today is already enough to reconsider what we are about to read in the news.

Will we drown when oceanic ice melts?

admin — Sun, 20 Dec 2009 01:51:22 +0000

Let’s think about this for a minute:

Ice takes space, the space goes down and now we have water replacing it:

In the first state, we have an ice cube of mass m floating in the water. If it is floating (in equilibrium), it will have to displace enough water to support its weight. How much is that? It is just Volume = m/d , where m is the mass of the ice cube, and d is the density of water.

In the second state, where the ice has melted, it turns into water of volume…. Volume = m/d! exactly the same volume as it displaced before. So the added volume is the same, so the level of the water will not change.

As a matter of fact, as long as objects are floating (i.e. they don’t rest on the bottom) they displace enough water to support their mass. Since by turning from solid to liquid, the mass of water does not change (well, maybe it does, due to mass-energy equivalence, but that’s _really_ negligible) it will keep displacing the same amount of water.

However, note that this may not apply to everything. If you had solid alcohol floating in water, when it melts, the level would drop, because water and alcohol mix at the molecular level; i.e. water filling spaces among alcohol molecules.

Answered by: Yasar Safkan, Ph.D., Sofware Engineer, Noktalar A.S., Istanbul, Turkey

The water level remains the same when the ice cube melts.

But remember: If Antarctica was to melt, the ice on the land would of course raise the sea level. Arctic (North Pole) ice is in the water and Antarctic ice (South Pole) on land. So yes, we would see a rise in the sea level. If indeed the ice was melting, but please see post below.

Would it melt enough volume to raise the sea level significantly enough to provide danger?

Our upcoming post is going to look deeper into that myth/truth for us.

Thank you for tuning in!

Did Copenhagen fail?

admin — Sun, 20 Dec 2009 00:15:47 +0000

Many are talking about politicians getting more educated. Others say Copenhagen was a silent event rather than public.
A deal may have been reached between the U.S. China, India and South Africa.
But where is the truth in all of this? How can we know we are not being fooled into believing that something is happening when in reality there is absolutely no cause for concern.
How many of you are interested and willing to spend some time and energy to individually analyze the data yourself.
Don’t go to GreenPeace or any other organization. University of Illinois is one where you can look for yourself without the need to repeat verbal threats of the earth melting away. You will recognize that the earth has been warming for the past 300 years and for the past 15 years it hasn’t. But hey, I may just be repeating what Christopher Monckton is saying:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzkB5DuveDE

But by all means: Stay away from websites owned by those who may have a hidden agenda.

Note: The moment you are getting strong enough to think for yourself, you will make a real difference.
Minimercials about eating less meat will not fill the ozone layer.

Only by respecting facts are we going to be able to unite and attack real issues.

Your ECO GOP team!

Newt Gingrich on Green Conservatism

admin — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:59:59 +0000

Green conservatism is about finding sustainable solutions which are not going to require sending false information to the American people in order to make people aware of issues. Newt Gingrich is talking about how efficient nuclear power can be and how tax money intended for green programs magically gets lost. Gingrich outlines solutions which are feasible and result oriented without arguing about the media created hysteria we have been forcefully presented with. Please buy his book called Man vs. Nature from Amazon: Newt: “I believe that we can create a green conservatism based on science, based on Incentives, based on tax credits and I think we can do a better job than those on the left becasue their beaucracies inherintly can’t deliver.”

A Contract with the Earth

Hello world!

admin — Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:15:59 +0000

Welcome to ecogop.com. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!